By: Patrick Hinga George, Public Education Officer ACC
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC), Kenema Regional Office, on 13th April 2026, convened a high-level engagement with Court Chairmen and Clerks from Local Courts No. 1, 2, 3, and 4, following a surge in public complaints alleging misconduct within the local court system. The meeting, held at the High Court Building in Kenema, brought together key stakeholders to address growing concerns over administrative and ethical lapses reported by members of the public.
In her opening remarks, Regional Director Hawanatu O. Kamara stated that the engagement was prompted by numerous allegations, including the failure to issue official receipts, the imposition of illegal or unauthorised fees, poor record-keeping and missing case files, delays in case handling, and a general lack of transparency in court proceedings.
She reminded officials that the Local Courts Act serves as a fundamental guide in the execution of their duties and stressed the need for strict compliance. Referencing findings from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Report, she noted that injustice and abuse of authority were among the key drivers of corruption that contributed to Sierra Leone’s eleven-year civil war. She cautioned that such practices must not be allowed to resurface in any form within the justice system.
Director Kamara further warned officials to comply fully with the provisions of the 2011 Act, emphasising that all revenues generated by the courts must be properly accounted for and paid into designated accounts, rather than diverted for personal use, regardless of challenges such as the absence of salaries.
Delivering a statement, Senior Public Education Officer Edward N. Blake highlighted the critical role of local courts in the dispensation of justice, particularly at the community level where they often serve as the first point of contact for many citizens. He stressed that public confidence in the justice system is largely dependent on the integrity and professionalism of court officials.
Mr. Blake cautioned against any deviation from lawful and ethical standards, urging officials to abandon illegal practices and uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and professionalism.
Reinforcing the Commission’s position, Investigation Officer Andrew Komeh clarified that the operations of local courts fall within the scope of the Anti-Corruption Act 2008 (as amended in 2019). He dismissed claims that the absence of formal salaries could justify corrupt practices, noting that the law broadly defines a “public officer” to include volunteers engaged in public service.
He reiterated that the ACC is mandated to detect, prevent, investigate, and prosecute corruption offences. He outlined key offences under the Act, including soliciting or accepting an advantage, abuse of office, misappropriation of public funds, conspiracy, and bribery.
Mr. Komeh also highlighted the offence of influencing a public officer, encouraging officials to report any attempts to improperly influence their decisions or actions. He warned that individuals found guilty of corruption risk arrest, prosecution, fines, imprisonment, dismissal from office, disqualification from holding public office for a minimum of five years, restitution, and lasting reputational damage. He concluded by urging officials to maintain the highest standards of integrity by issuing official receipts, safeguarding case files and records, and administering justice impartially.
Earlier, in his welcome address, Customary Law Officer Andrew F. Kamara provided historical context on the administration of local courts. He noted that the Local Courts Act of 2011 formally placed local courts under the supervision of the judiciary, having previously operated under local government structures. He emphasised that, as part of the judiciary, local courts are expected to demonstrate professionalism and strict adherence to legal and ethical standards.
